latest news pakistan image
Icecool
Even if it wasn't, the war in Afghanistan is not a honest solution and won't solve the problem. Al Qadea can move to Somalia, Pakistan, Aden, the tribal areas and other places if they want to train and America won't invade there. Why are Americans so delusional and complacent?
Answer
There is a hidden agenda that has nothing to do with terrorism. Aaron Russo explained it best in an interview. I put together a report on 9/11 and I'm going to give all of it to you so it might be useful in helping you to convince others. You answer is , however, in the Aaron Russo interview. It will blow you away! Watch all of it by the way. Anyway, here is my report (including Aaron Russo's interview):
BEGIN TEXT:
Please watch this first video linked here. Itâs only one minute. Youâre going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, âwait, this doesnât fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.â True. This is just one piece of evidence, but itâs a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didnât see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?
The government has promoted a âtheoryâ that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Letâs continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in itâs own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age â more hits when âdead ageâ excluded)
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, âHold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.â True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barryâs testimony on TV.
William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294&ei=beHcSfiDF4L8qAPn2eD4DQ&q=William+Rodriguez&hl=en
(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez)
Now, letâs look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the âvoice of reasonâ during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston
(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)
In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded ânanostructured super-thermiteâ particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/scientists-find-active-super-thermite-in-wtc-dust.html
The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the âdownloadâ link here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!
Steve Jonesâ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, âThe news media isnât going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.â So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?
Then take a look at this:
Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips â you get more hits by excluding âslipsâ)
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his
There is a hidden agenda that has nothing to do with terrorism. Aaron Russo explained it best in an interview. I put together a report on 9/11 and I'm going to give all of it to you so it might be useful in helping you to convince others. You answer is , however, in the Aaron Russo interview. It will blow you away! Watch all of it by the way. Anyway, here is my report (including Aaron Russo's interview):
BEGIN TEXT:
Please watch this first video linked here. Itâs only one minute. Youâre going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, âwait, this doesnât fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.â True. This is just one piece of evidence, but itâs a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didnât see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?
The government has promoted a âtheoryâ that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Letâs continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in itâs own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age â more hits when âdead ageâ excluded)
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, âHold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.â True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barryâs testimony on TV.
William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294&ei=beHcSfiDF4L8qAPn2eD4DQ&q=William+Rodriguez&hl=en
(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez)
Now, letâs look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the âvoice of reasonâ during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston
(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)
In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded ânanostructured super-thermiteâ particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/scientists-find-active-super-thermite-in-wtc-dust.html
The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the âdownloadâ link here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!
Steve Jonesâ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, âThe news media isnât going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.â So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?
Then take a look at this:
Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips â you get more hits by excluding âslipsâ)
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his
No comments:
Post a Comment