Q.
Answer
21 people killed in Mexican drug war 20 miles south of Arizona's border.
What did Obama tell Senator Kyl? "If I secure the border now then you all won't have a reason to support comprehensive immigration reform" (Amnesty)
21 people killed in Mexican drug war 20 miles south of Arizona's border.
What did Obama tell Senator Kyl? "If I secure the border now then you all won't have a reason to support comprehensive immigration reform" (Amnesty)
Immigration reform would add $1.5 trillion to the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) over 10 years, so.....?
Greasy Ton
why are Republicans against?
===========================
http://abcnews.go.com/ABC_Univision/News/analysis-economic-impact-immigration-reform/story?id=17761157#.UZUl38qB4ig
Analysis: What Is the Economic Impact of Immigration Reform?
- Comprehensive reform would include a pathway to citizenship for undocumented immigrants who register, pay a fine and pass a criminal background check. That would add $1.5 trillion to the GDP over 10 years.
- A temporary worker program with no path to citizenship would add $792 million to the GDP, about half as much as reform.
Their parents have already paid billions in taxes, so what they've paid into the system, covers their education, and more. Allowing them to stay, and further their education would mean they'll contribute a whole lot more. FACT!
Answer
Here's a clue: if it says something like "analysis" at the top, its what people call an "opinion". No where in your article does it say "how" that assertion is true but merely throws the numbers out! Meanwhile, when those newly embraced "citizens" decide to NOT PAY 10 years of "back taxes" and a "fine" and then refuse to leave the country, what will it cost then since "mass deportations" are not "cost effective" or "the right thing to do"? And when those "temporary workers" all stay past their expiration dates, do we just start over again with more "comprehensive immigration reform" twenty years later after decades of more "debate"? Here's an idea to save all of us "more money" which keeps the status quo as it is (since it will be the same later anyways): lets just pass a bill giving democrats DOUBLE VOTES (one = two) and watch how quickly your "leaders" forget all about those pesky illegal immigrants... they'll probably even revert to calling them "wet backs" once again since the only "right thing to do" is pandering their votes!
Here's a clue: if it says something like "analysis" at the top, its what people call an "opinion". No where in your article does it say "how" that assertion is true but merely throws the numbers out! Meanwhile, when those newly embraced "citizens" decide to NOT PAY 10 years of "back taxes" and a "fine" and then refuse to leave the country, what will it cost then since "mass deportations" are not "cost effective" or "the right thing to do"? And when those "temporary workers" all stay past their expiration dates, do we just start over again with more "comprehensive immigration reform" twenty years later after decades of more "debate"? Here's an idea to save all of us "more money" which keeps the status quo as it is (since it will be the same later anyways): lets just pass a bill giving democrats DOUBLE VOTES (one = two) and watch how quickly your "leaders" forget all about those pesky illegal immigrants... they'll probably even revert to calling them "wet backs" once again since the only "right thing to do" is pandering their votes!
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment