popular news in india image
seamy
...behavior?
Who claims credit for these attacks? How many attackers were there? There have been precious few details in the news. How could this possibly help any group or nation? Is it just revenge? What kind of philosophy could justify random murder?
Answer
The Hindu reports:
MUMBAI: Maharashtra Police investigators say they have evidence that operatives of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out the fidayeen-squad attacks in Mumbai â a charge which, if proven, could have far-reaching consequences for India-Pakistan relations.
The Guardian reports:
A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen claimed the operation. The name indicates a local group - the Deccan is the central Indian plateau - and a probable link to the Indian Mujahideen who started a bloody bombing campaign a year ago.
The Herald Sun reports:
AT LEAST seven terrorists who took part in the bloody massacre in Mumbai that has left more than 190 dead and 295 injured have been linked to Britain.
In addition, Time Magazine has a list of possible groups involved.
Reports Iâve heard imply that there were about two dozen attackers, and that they moved with the sort of precise coordination that reminded me of classes in small unit tactics. Far from being random, their attacks were precisely aimed.
The terrorists staged a well-planned attack on Indiaâs financial capital. They devastated two key business hotels - one of which was a historic Indian landmark - and struck at its most popular tourist cafe.
It was a sophisticated propaganda exercise aimed at hitting India where it hurts most: its emerging status as an economic power. But beyond their competence in executing their aims, little is known of the estimated two dozen men who attacked the city of some 18m people.
The thing that is most clear is that they planned the operation to the last detail. Ratan Tata, the industrialist whose group owns the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower hotel, said the gunmen knew every detail of the complex, which combines a 105-year old structure with a newer high-rise section.
"They seem to know their way around the back part of the hotel and the kitchens, so one assumes there has been a considerable amount of planning in this operation," Mr Tata said.
A marine commando officer, who appeared on television, said the terrorists knew the layout of the hotel better than his men did.
"The Taj has 400 rooms. We do not know the layout of the hotel. Staff did not know the layout. When we had to go in, we had to go on our own," he said.
Think about that. The terrorists who hit the Taj Mahal knew its internal layout better than the people who work there. Considerable planning and memorizing and rehearsing went into this.
Initial word from interrogation of one terrorist who was taken alive:
Kasab has told police that they were sent with a specific mission of targeting Israelis to avenge atrocities on Palestinians. This was why they targetted Nariman House, a complex meant for Israelis. Sources said Kasabâs colleagues killed in the operation had stayed in Nariman House earlier.
Itâs unclear to me whether Nariman House is another name for Chabad House, or if there were attacks on two Jewish community centers. Every other target catered to Europeans and Americans visiting the city, from the Taj Mahal to a restaurant that shows up in American books on backpacking across India.
The Chabad House was one of 10 sites attacked in a well-coordinated onslaught that targeted tourists, especially American and British nationals. Other targets included a railroad station, two hotels, including the Taj Mahal Hotel, a tourist restaurant and two hospitals.
Itâs clear to me that the attack was planned and coordinated as a light infantry assault on unprotected targets. The distinction between combatants and noncombatants, specified in the laws of war is one that has been under attack on all fronts, from terrorists to the United States Government.
The attackers clearly subscribe to this notion. They also appear to place blame on groups rather than individuals, which means that punishing members of a group are (almost?) as good as punishing the individuals whose actions they're angry about. Theyâre angry at Westerners and Jews, so they attacked the easiest Westerners and Jews to reach. And they did so in a fashion designed to maximize the death toll and news coverage.
The Hindu reports:
MUMBAI: Maharashtra Police investigators say they have evidence that operatives of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out the fidayeen-squad attacks in Mumbai â a charge which, if proven, could have far-reaching consequences for India-Pakistan relations.
The Guardian reports:
A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen claimed the operation. The name indicates a local group - the Deccan is the central Indian plateau - and a probable link to the Indian Mujahideen who started a bloody bombing campaign a year ago.
The Herald Sun reports:
AT LEAST seven terrorists who took part in the bloody massacre in Mumbai that has left more than 190 dead and 295 injured have been linked to Britain.
In addition, Time Magazine has a list of possible groups involved.
Reports Iâve heard imply that there were about two dozen attackers, and that they moved with the sort of precise coordination that reminded me of classes in small unit tactics. Far from being random, their attacks were precisely aimed.
The terrorists staged a well-planned attack on Indiaâs financial capital. They devastated two key business hotels - one of which was a historic Indian landmark - and struck at its most popular tourist cafe.
It was a sophisticated propaganda exercise aimed at hitting India where it hurts most: its emerging status as an economic power. But beyond their competence in executing their aims, little is known of the estimated two dozen men who attacked the city of some 18m people.
The thing that is most clear is that they planned the operation to the last detail. Ratan Tata, the industrialist whose group owns the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower hotel, said the gunmen knew every detail of the complex, which combines a 105-year old structure with a newer high-rise section.
"They seem to know their way around the back part of the hotel and the kitchens, so one assumes there has been a considerable amount of planning in this operation," Mr Tata said.
A marine commando officer, who appeared on television, said the terrorists knew the layout of the hotel better than his men did.
"The Taj has 400 rooms. We do not know the layout of the hotel. Staff did not know the layout. When we had to go in, we had to go on our own," he said.
Think about that. The terrorists who hit the Taj Mahal knew its internal layout better than the people who work there. Considerable planning and memorizing and rehearsing went into this.
Initial word from interrogation of one terrorist who was taken alive:
Kasab has told police that they were sent with a specific mission of targeting Israelis to avenge atrocities on Palestinians. This was why they targetted Nariman House, a complex meant for Israelis. Sources said Kasabâs colleagues killed in the operation had stayed in Nariman House earlier.
Itâs unclear to me whether Nariman House is another name for Chabad House, or if there were attacks on two Jewish community centers. Every other target catered to Europeans and Americans visiting the city, from the Taj Mahal to a restaurant that shows up in American books on backpacking across India.
The Chabad House was one of 10 sites attacked in a well-coordinated onslaught that targeted tourists, especially American and British nationals. Other targets included a railroad station, two hotels, including the Taj Mahal Hotel, a tourist restaurant and two hospitals.
Itâs clear to me that the attack was planned and coordinated as a light infantry assault on unprotected targets. The distinction between combatants and noncombatants, specified in the laws of war is one that has been under attack on all fronts, from terrorists to the United States Government.
The attackers clearly subscribe to this notion. They also appear to place blame on groups rather than individuals, which means that punishing members of a group are (almost?) as good as punishing the individuals whose actions they're angry about. Theyâre angry at Westerners and Jews, so they attacked the easiest Westerners and Jews to reach. And they did so in a fashion designed to maximize the death toll and news coverage.
What group carried out the attacks in India? How could anyone justified such murderous...?
chiefdom
...behavior?
Who claims credit for these attacks? How many attackers were there? There have been precious few details in the news. How could this possibly help any group or nation? Is it just revenge? What kind of philosophy could justify random murder?
Answer
The Hindu reports:
MUMBAI: Maharashtra Police investigators say they have evidence that operatives of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out the fidayeen-squad attacks in Mumbai â a charge which, if proven, could have far-reaching consequences for India-Pakistan relations.
The Guardian reports:
A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen claimed the operation. The name indicates a local group - the Deccan is the central Indian plateau - and a probable link to the Indian Mujahideen who started a bloody bombing campaign a year ago.
The Herald Sun reports:
AT LEAST seven terrorists who took part in the bloody massacre in Mumbai that has left more than 190 dead and 295 injured have been linked to Britain.
In addition, Time Magazine has a list of possible groups involved.
Reports Iâve heard imply that there were about two dozen attackers, and that they moved with the sort of precise coordination that reminded me of classes in small unit tactics. Far from being random, their attacks were precisely aimed.
The terrorists staged a well-planned attack on Indiaâs financial capital. They devastated two key business hotels - one of which was a historic Indian landmark - and struck at its most popular tourist cafe.
It was a sophisticated propaganda exercise aimed at hitting India where it hurts most: its emerging status as an economic power. But beyond their competence in executing their aims, little is known of the estimated two dozen men who attacked the city of some 18m people.
The thing that is most clear is that they planned the operation to the last detail. Ratan Tata, the industrialist whose group owns the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower hotel, said the gunmen knew every detail of the complex, which combines a 105-year old structure with a newer high-rise section.
"They seem to know their way around the back part of the hotel and the kitchens, so one assumes there has been a considerable amount of planning in this operation," Mr Tata said.
A marine commando officer, who appeared on television, said the terrorists knew the layout of the hotel better than his men did.
"The Taj has 400 rooms. We do not know the layout of the hotel. Staff did not know the layout. When we had to go in, we had to go on our own," he said.
Think about that. The terrorists who hit the Taj Mahal knew its internal layout better than the people who work there. Considerable planning and memorizing and rehearsing went into this.
Initial word from interrogation of one terrorist who was taken alive:
Kasab has told police that they were sent with a specific mission of targeting Israelis to avenge atrocities on Palestinians. This was why they targetted Nariman House, a complex meant for Israelis. Sources said Kasabâs colleagues killed in the operation had stayed in Nariman House earlier.
Itâs unclear to me whether Nariman House is another name for Chabad House, or if there were attacks on two Jewish community centers. Every other target catered to Europeans and Americans visiting the city, from the Taj Mahal to a restaurant that shows up in American books on backpacking across India.
The Chabad House was one of 10 sites attacked in a well-coordinated onslaught that targeted tourists, especially American and British nationals. Other targets included a railroad station, two hotels, including the Taj Mahal Hotel, a tourist restaurant and two hospitals.
Itâs clear to me that the attack was planned and coordinated as a light infantry assault on unprotected targets. The distinction between combatants and noncombatants, specified in the laws of war is one that has been under attack on all fronts, from terrorists to the United States Government.
The attackers clearly subscribe to this notion. They also appear to place blame on groups rather than individuals, which means that punishing members of a group are (almost?) as good as punishing the individuals whose actions they're angry about. Theyâre angry at Westerners and Jews, so they attacked the easiest Westerners and Jews to reach. And they did so in a fashion designed to maximize the death toll and news coverage.
The Hindu reports:
MUMBAI: Maharashtra Police investigators say they have evidence that operatives of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba carried out the fidayeen-squad attacks in Mumbai â a charge which, if proven, could have far-reaching consequences for India-Pakistan relations.
The Guardian reports:
A group calling itself the Deccan Mujahideen claimed the operation. The name indicates a local group - the Deccan is the central Indian plateau - and a probable link to the Indian Mujahideen who started a bloody bombing campaign a year ago.
The Herald Sun reports:
AT LEAST seven terrorists who took part in the bloody massacre in Mumbai that has left more than 190 dead and 295 injured have been linked to Britain.
In addition, Time Magazine has a list of possible groups involved.
Reports Iâve heard imply that there were about two dozen attackers, and that they moved with the sort of precise coordination that reminded me of classes in small unit tactics. Far from being random, their attacks were precisely aimed.
The terrorists staged a well-planned attack on Indiaâs financial capital. They devastated two key business hotels - one of which was a historic Indian landmark - and struck at its most popular tourist cafe.
It was a sophisticated propaganda exercise aimed at hitting India where it hurts most: its emerging status as an economic power. But beyond their competence in executing their aims, little is known of the estimated two dozen men who attacked the city of some 18m people.
The thing that is most clear is that they planned the operation to the last detail. Ratan Tata, the industrialist whose group owns the Taj Mahal Palace and Tower hotel, said the gunmen knew every detail of the complex, which combines a 105-year old structure with a newer high-rise section.
"They seem to know their way around the back part of the hotel and the kitchens, so one assumes there has been a considerable amount of planning in this operation," Mr Tata said.
A marine commando officer, who appeared on television, said the terrorists knew the layout of the hotel better than his men did.
"The Taj has 400 rooms. We do not know the layout of the hotel. Staff did not know the layout. When we had to go in, we had to go on our own," he said.
Think about that. The terrorists who hit the Taj Mahal knew its internal layout better than the people who work there. Considerable planning and memorizing and rehearsing went into this.
Initial word from interrogation of one terrorist who was taken alive:
Kasab has told police that they were sent with a specific mission of targeting Israelis to avenge atrocities on Palestinians. This was why they targetted Nariman House, a complex meant for Israelis. Sources said Kasabâs colleagues killed in the operation had stayed in Nariman House earlier.
Itâs unclear to me whether Nariman House is another name for Chabad House, or if there were attacks on two Jewish community centers. Every other target catered to Europeans and Americans visiting the city, from the Taj Mahal to a restaurant that shows up in American books on backpacking across India.
The Chabad House was one of 10 sites attacked in a well-coordinated onslaught that targeted tourists, especially American and British nationals. Other targets included a railroad station, two hotels, including the Taj Mahal Hotel, a tourist restaurant and two hospitals.
Itâs clear to me that the attack was planned and coordinated as a light infantry assault on unprotected targets. The distinction between combatants and noncombatants, specified in the laws of war is one that has been under attack on all fronts, from terrorists to the United States Government.
The attackers clearly subscribe to this notion. They also appear to place blame on groups rather than individuals, which means that punishing members of a group are (almost?) as good as punishing the individuals whose actions they're angry about. Theyâre angry at Westerners and Jews, so they attacked the easiest Westerners and Jews to reach. And they did so in a fashion designed to maximize the death toll and news coverage.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment