popular news of 2011 image
Hob
The rich vs poor thing seems to be a popular go to argument for Democrats these days. I wonder if they see any irony in supporting a bunch of millionaires and billionaires in that party who take just as much money from corporations and special interests as Republicans. I'm not saying Republicans aren't also rich and well connected but they don't play up this "i wanna help the poor" bit as much as the Democrats do.
correction: supporting*
Answer
As far as the class warfare stupidity......the dems bring new meaning to the word hypocrisy.
Nancy Pelosi's wealth grows 62% to $35.2M
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-06-16/news/29687626_1_stock-gains-house-speaker-charles-rangel
Harry Reid has a net worth of $5 million.
http://dailyimportentnews.blogspot.com/2011/07/us-senator-harry-reid-net-worth-2011.html
Barack Hussein Obama II, has an estimated net worth of $10.5 million
http://www.therichest.org/celebnetworth/politician/president/barack-obama-net-worth/
As far as the class warfare stupidity......the dems bring new meaning to the word hypocrisy.
Nancy Pelosi's wealth grows 62% to $35.2M
http://articles.nydailynews.com/2011-06-16/news/29687626_1_stock-gains-house-speaker-charles-rangel
Harry Reid has a net worth of $5 million.
http://dailyimportentnews.blogspot.com/2011/07/us-senator-harry-reid-net-worth-2011.html
Barack Hussein Obama II, has an estimated net worth of $10.5 million
http://www.therichest.org/celebnetworth/politician/president/barack-obama-net-worth/
When did the Libya revolution start (current one)?
Q. I know that Libya has been in the news for the past few days in regards to the current revolution, but can any1 give me an exact date(s) as to when this revolution first started? Please and thank u.
Answer
Libya Riots linked to Gaddafiâs comments on Israel?
Is it merely a coincidence that less than a week after Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi threatened Israel by calling on Palestinians to capitalize on the wave of popular uprisings in the Middle East by massing peacefully on the borders of the Zionist state, his own regime is teetering on the brink of extinction following massive anti-government riots in Benghazi and Tripoli?
On Sunday last week, Gaddafi urged the Arab world to revolt against Israel during a speech on state television.
âFleets of boats should take Palestinians ⦠and wait by the Palestinian shores until the problem is resolved,â Gaddafi said. âThis is a time of popular revolutions.â
âWe need to create a problem for the world. This is not a declaration of war. This is a call for peace,â he said.
Low and behold, just days after Gaddafiâs very bold threat to seize on the wave of revolutions as a means of toppling Israel, Gaddafi himself is forced to flee Tripoli as protesters burn down government buildings and take control of entire cities.
This tells you an awful lot about who is really behind the wave of revolutions sweeping the region â the US military industrial-complex that kick-started them in the first place.
It seems as though the new world order hierarchy has now got all its ducks in a row as part of a massive propaganda and destabilization assault aimed at Libya in an effort to hijack the revolution and steer its outcome to suit their interests, just as has unfolded in Egypt where a gaggle of NGOâs and globalist forces have swooped in to feed off the vacuum of power left by Hosni Mubarakâs ousting.
Gaddafiâs very public threat to Israel was undoubtedly one of the primary factors that sealed his fate and made him a target of the contrived revolutions now sweeping the region.
In his speech today, Gaddafiâs son Sayf al-Islam vowed that his father and security forces would fight âuntil the last bulletâ to uphold their regime, blaming the revolt on outside forces and chastising the global media for exaggerating the brutality of the government response.
The establishment media is once again manufacturing the narrative behind the protests in Libya. Given the scant amount of credible information coming out of the country, talking heads have hastily made parallels to Egypt and Tunisia, a red flag in and of itself given that both these uprisings involved the manipulative hand of the US military-industrial complex.
Demonstrators seem to have a poor grasp of the powerful global interests that are driving the protests, and how they could end up in a worse situation than what they began with.
In the case of Egypt the elimination of U.S. puppet Hosni Mubarak has only resulted in a military dictatorship taking the reigns of power.
As far back as December 2008, the US Embassy was aware of plans to overthrow Mubarak in 2011 and had begun secretly funding rebel leaders to spearhead the campaign.
âI believe we are seeing the destabilization of all the regimes in the area beginning with Tunisia moving to Egypt, but unfortunately I think the intended result of this is to see it take place in your country of Iran. I think that is the end result that they [Western countries] want to see take place is regime change in countries that are unfavorable to Israel and the US,â geopolitical analyst Mark Glenn tells Press TV.
Glenn points out that the same conditions that made Egypt and Tunisia ripe for revolutions are absent in Libya, GDP growth is good and the economy is doing well.
Whatâs happening in Libya represents, âAnother color revolution thatâs been backed and pushed by [George] Soros and other economic interests tied to political interests in the west,â remarks Glenn, adding that all the revolutions have been uncharacteristically leaderless, allowing western forces to pick up the pieces by offering financial âassistanceâ to whatever form of government takes over, hijacking the aftermath and reshaping the international order in their own image.
âNo matter who comes to power they are already over a barrel; theyâre being held by the throat by these western financial interests who are going to dictate terms to these new governments,â warns Glenn, adding that whether or not the revolutions were genuine to begin with, they will always be thwarted by succumbing to this process.
Libya Riots linked to Gaddafiâs comments on Israel?
Is it merely a coincidence that less than a week after Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi threatened Israel by calling on Palestinians to capitalize on the wave of popular uprisings in the Middle East by massing peacefully on the borders of the Zionist state, his own regime is teetering on the brink of extinction following massive anti-government riots in Benghazi and Tripoli?
On Sunday last week, Gaddafi urged the Arab world to revolt against Israel during a speech on state television.
âFleets of boats should take Palestinians ⦠and wait by the Palestinian shores until the problem is resolved,â Gaddafi said. âThis is a time of popular revolutions.â
âWe need to create a problem for the world. This is not a declaration of war. This is a call for peace,â he said.
Low and behold, just days after Gaddafiâs very bold threat to seize on the wave of revolutions as a means of toppling Israel, Gaddafi himself is forced to flee Tripoli as protesters burn down government buildings and take control of entire cities.
This tells you an awful lot about who is really behind the wave of revolutions sweeping the region â the US military industrial-complex that kick-started them in the first place.
It seems as though the new world order hierarchy has now got all its ducks in a row as part of a massive propaganda and destabilization assault aimed at Libya in an effort to hijack the revolution and steer its outcome to suit their interests, just as has unfolded in Egypt where a gaggle of NGOâs and globalist forces have swooped in to feed off the vacuum of power left by Hosni Mubarakâs ousting.
Gaddafiâs very public threat to Israel was undoubtedly one of the primary factors that sealed his fate and made him a target of the contrived revolutions now sweeping the region.
In his speech today, Gaddafiâs son Sayf al-Islam vowed that his father and security forces would fight âuntil the last bulletâ to uphold their regime, blaming the revolt on outside forces and chastising the global media for exaggerating the brutality of the government response.
The establishment media is once again manufacturing the narrative behind the protests in Libya. Given the scant amount of credible information coming out of the country, talking heads have hastily made parallels to Egypt and Tunisia, a red flag in and of itself given that both these uprisings involved the manipulative hand of the US military-industrial complex.
Demonstrators seem to have a poor grasp of the powerful global interests that are driving the protests, and how they could end up in a worse situation than what they began with.
In the case of Egypt the elimination of U.S. puppet Hosni Mubarak has only resulted in a military dictatorship taking the reigns of power.
As far back as December 2008, the US Embassy was aware of plans to overthrow Mubarak in 2011 and had begun secretly funding rebel leaders to spearhead the campaign.
âI believe we are seeing the destabilization of all the regimes in the area beginning with Tunisia moving to Egypt, but unfortunately I think the intended result of this is to see it take place in your country of Iran. I think that is the end result that they [Western countries] want to see take place is regime change in countries that are unfavorable to Israel and the US,â geopolitical analyst Mark Glenn tells Press TV.
Glenn points out that the same conditions that made Egypt and Tunisia ripe for revolutions are absent in Libya, GDP growth is good and the economy is doing well.
Whatâs happening in Libya represents, âAnother color revolution thatâs been backed and pushed by [George] Soros and other economic interests tied to political interests in the west,â remarks Glenn, adding that all the revolutions have been uncharacteristically leaderless, allowing western forces to pick up the pieces by offering financial âassistanceâ to whatever form of government takes over, hijacking the aftermath and reshaping the international order in their own image.
âNo matter who comes to power they are already over a barrel; theyâre being held by the throat by these western financial interests who are going to dictate terms to these new governments,â warns Glenn, adding that whether or not the revolutions were genuine to begin with, they will always be thwarted by succumbing to this process.
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment