celebrity gossip columnist image
Q. I'm researching this for speech, but nothing I read gives very good details. Will someone please help?
Answer
1) To 'dress casual but tidy' or looking informal means wear something appropriate for wear or clothes you would use on INFORMAL occasions. Try not to be too dressy like don't wear something you would wear to the prom. Also don't wear something tacky or inappropriate. For example, don't wear clothes that are: unfashionable, shabby in appearance, shoddy; cheaply vulgar; crude; gaudy; flashy or showy. Blue jeans with holes & t-shirts with logo, etc and stuff you would use in the garden or paint with I would not wear. To wear conservative apparel that is traditional in style and similarly being worn by others. The formal attire may included tuxedos and full-length gowns or your best clothes and looking the best to fit the part.
2) A gossip columnist is someone who writes a gossip column in a newspaper or magazine, especially a gossip magazine. Gossip columns are material written in a light, informal style, which relates the gossip columnist's opinions about the personal lives or conduct of celebrities from show business (motion picture movie stars, theater, and television actors) politicians, professional sports stars, and other wealthy people or public figures. Some gossip columnists broadcast segments on radio and television.
3) Similarly, styles, though still used, are used less often. The current President of Ireland, Mary McAleese, is usually referred to as President Mary McAleese, not President McAleese, as had been the form used for the first six presidents, from President Hyde to President Hillery. Tony Blair asked initially to be called Tony. In a break with tradition, though as the second in line to the throne and a son of a royal prince, Prince William of Wales formally has a HRH style, he chose while at university not to use it. The United States has become one of the most informal countries in the world[citation needed], with styles such as Excellency now largely abandoned or ignored, even by those who legally have them. First names, or even nicknames, are often widely used among politicians in the US, even in formal situations (as an extreme example, President James Earl "Jimmy" Carter chose to take the Oath of Office using his nickname). One notable exception involves judges: a judge of any court is almost invariably addressed as "Your Honor" while presiding over his or her court, and often at other times as well. This style has been removed in the Republic of Ireland, where judges are addressed only as "Judge".
However, styles are still widely used in formal documents and correspondence between heads of state, such as in a Letter of Credence accrediting an ambassador from one head of state to another.
I just touched the subject of this broad question, by being more specific in particular area of your speech concerns you may find that more direct details for your new question should be in order.
1) To 'dress casual but tidy' or looking informal means wear something appropriate for wear or clothes you would use on INFORMAL occasions. Try not to be too dressy like don't wear something you would wear to the prom. Also don't wear something tacky or inappropriate. For example, don't wear clothes that are: unfashionable, shabby in appearance, shoddy; cheaply vulgar; crude; gaudy; flashy or showy. Blue jeans with holes & t-shirts with logo, etc and stuff you would use in the garden or paint with I would not wear. To wear conservative apparel that is traditional in style and similarly being worn by others. The formal attire may included tuxedos and full-length gowns or your best clothes and looking the best to fit the part.
2) A gossip columnist is someone who writes a gossip column in a newspaper or magazine, especially a gossip magazine. Gossip columns are material written in a light, informal style, which relates the gossip columnist's opinions about the personal lives or conduct of celebrities from show business (motion picture movie stars, theater, and television actors) politicians, professional sports stars, and other wealthy people or public figures. Some gossip columnists broadcast segments on radio and television.
3) Similarly, styles, though still used, are used less often. The current President of Ireland, Mary McAleese, is usually referred to as President Mary McAleese, not President McAleese, as had been the form used for the first six presidents, from President Hyde to President Hillery. Tony Blair asked initially to be called Tony. In a break with tradition, though as the second in line to the throne and a son of a royal prince, Prince William of Wales formally has a HRH style, he chose while at university not to use it. The United States has become one of the most informal countries in the world[citation needed], with styles such as Excellency now largely abandoned or ignored, even by those who legally have them. First names, or even nicknames, are often widely used among politicians in the US, even in formal situations (as an extreme example, President James Earl "Jimmy" Carter chose to take the Oath of Office using his nickname). One notable exception involves judges: a judge of any court is almost invariably addressed as "Your Honor" while presiding over his or her court, and often at other times as well. This style has been removed in the Republic of Ireland, where judges are addressed only as "Judge".
However, styles are still widely used in formal documents and correspondence between heads of state, such as in a Letter of Credence accrediting an ambassador from one head of state to another.
I just touched the subject of this broad question, by being more specific in particular area of your speech concerns you may find that more direct details for your new question should be in order.
How can Conservatives claim that the media is liberal biased when McCain is not receiving any negative press?
Liberal Ci
All the focus is either on Obama or Hilary. It appears as though the media already chosen their choice as president, which is McCain.
Answer
It's amazing to see how a guy who used racial slurs himself, was involved in the Keating Five scandal,had mental health issues in the past or still does, who knows?, flip flopped on virtually all the issues , is being treated compared to the Democratic candidates.
The Liberal Media myth is a propaganda tool employed by conservative radio hosts, columnists and pundits as a convenient excuse why after 20 years their ideology has failed to convince the public at large, and as a memetic inocculation of the public against the evidence that the media bias is in fact a conservative one.
Not only does the liberal media claim have no basis in fact, it also does not make sense considering the issues of media ownership and influence of advertisers. Most media outlets are owned by a handful of conservative corporations and individuals, and funded by usually economically conservative advertisers who have no need for an educated, alert, independent and critical citizenry. What they need is a dumb, bored, cynical and apathetic public that has abandoned all critical faculties and is easily distracted by celebrity gossip and mindless sports games. A public that will believe anything it is told, or nothing at all, which amounts to the same end result. This pro-corporate conservative bias of the media is well-documented and shows itself in consistent under-reporting or ignoring of any information that would lead people to question the fundamental status quo
It's amazing to see how a guy who used racial slurs himself, was involved in the Keating Five scandal,had mental health issues in the past or still does, who knows?, flip flopped on virtually all the issues , is being treated compared to the Democratic candidates.
The Liberal Media myth is a propaganda tool employed by conservative radio hosts, columnists and pundits as a convenient excuse why after 20 years their ideology has failed to convince the public at large, and as a memetic inocculation of the public against the evidence that the media bias is in fact a conservative one.
Not only does the liberal media claim have no basis in fact, it also does not make sense considering the issues of media ownership and influence of advertisers. Most media outlets are owned by a handful of conservative corporations and individuals, and funded by usually economically conservative advertisers who have no need for an educated, alert, independent and critical citizenry. What they need is a dumb, bored, cynical and apathetic public that has abandoned all critical faculties and is easily distracted by celebrity gossip and mindless sports games. A public that will believe anything it is told, or nothing at all, which amounts to the same end result. This pro-corporate conservative bias of the media is well-documented and shows itself in consistent under-reporting or ignoring of any information that would lead people to question the fundamental status quo
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment