latest news about boston bombing image
Nainai55
Bush administration blamed it to terrorist and we heard news about terrorism arround the world..but who orchestrated and supported terrorists? If 9/11 was an inside job then American government is controlling the whole world with terrorism. I'm scared really.
Answer
I don't think that statistic is easily available but it's more all the time. The rest of your question is right on track. Our CIA financed the mujaheddin which later became Al Qaeda. They were OUR asset see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYvO3qAlyTg
Now let's see why the percentage of Americans believing 9/11 was an inside job will ONLY INCREASE (and never decrease) over time: Please watch this first video linked here. Itâs only one minute. Youâre going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, âwait, this doesnât fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.â True. This is just one piece of evidence, but itâs a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didnât see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?
The government has promoted a âtheoryâ that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Letâs continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in itâs own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age â more hits when âdead ageâ excluded)
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, âHold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.â True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barryâs testimony on TV.
William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294&ei=beHcSfiDF4L8qAPn2eD4DQ&q=William+Rodriguez&hl=en
(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez)
Now, letâs look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the âvoice of reasonâ during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston
(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)
In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded ânanostructured super-thermiteâ particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/scientists-find-active-super-thermite-in-wtc-dust.html
The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the âdownloadâ link here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!
Steve Jonesâ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, âThe news media isnât going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.â So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?
Then take a look at this:
Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips â you get more hits by excluding âslipsâ)
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). Itâs clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. Whatâs in it for these people that were âin the know?â
Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember âThe Roseâ and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name âFederal Reserveâ at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ
(Google Video Key Words: Aaron Russo Warnings)
One more thing. In February 2009 a 44 story Chinese skyscraper caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It DID COLLAPSE. See that article here:
http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse
(Google Key Words: China 44 fire consumes)
Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture. You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word âconspiracyâ is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.
I don't think that statistic is easily available but it's more all the time. The rest of your question is right on track. Our CIA financed the mujaheddin which later became Al Qaeda. They were OUR asset see this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYvO3qAlyTg
Now let's see why the percentage of Americans believing 9/11 was an inside job will ONLY INCREASE (and never decrease) over time: Please watch this first video linked here. Itâs only one minute. Youâre going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
(YouTube Key Words: Johannemann suicide)
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You say, âwait, this doesnât fit anything I know, maybe there is some other explanation for those explosions in the basement.â True. This is just one piece of evidence, but itâs a piece of evidence that raises a lot of questions. You didnât see this on TV either. Does that prick your interest?
The government has promoted a âtheoryâ that maybe the fuel from the jet trickled down the elevator shafts into the basement and subsequently exploded. Could this be? Letâs continue and look at other evidence. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Remember, Building Seven was NEVER hit by a jet. In Barry's case an explosion blew out a stair well below him leaving him hanging and stranded for hours until the fire department got him out. Both the twin towers went down during the time he was stranded. Building Seven, a tall building in itâs own right (47 stories tall), came down at around 5:20 (later that day). Fortunately, he was saved. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
(YouTube Key Words: Barry Jennings dead age â more hits when âdead ageâ excluded)
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. You say, âHold On! Building Seven housed the FBI and the CIA offices, so who would have access to set up explosives in there? There has got to be another explanation.â True. This is just one piece of evidence which raises more questions. Again, you didn't see Barryâs testimony on TV.
William Rodriguez, head janitor at the towers, was meeting with some people in basement level #1 (the highest of several basement levels) when an explosion from below pushed everyone upwards, causing ceiling tiles to fall and walls to crack. Just as William started to express to others what he thought that explosion might be, an airplane hit and shook the building from above. His story begins at 9:31 here:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4380137365762802294&ei=beHcSfiDF4L8qAPn2eD4DQ&q=William+Rodriguez&hl=en
(Google Video Key Words: William Rodriguez)
Now, letâs look for other different kinds of evidence. Steve Jones, a physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers from people who lived nearby. He analyzed it and found that the dust contained residues of explosives. Steve Jones first became famous when he became known as the âvoice of reasonâ during the Pons / Fleischman "Cold Fusion" debacle of 1989, if you remember that. For a Nuclear Physicist, like Steve Jones, analyzing dust samples for explosive residues is a relatively simple task. It may be similar to asking a PhD mathematician to do arithmetic. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston
(Google Video Key Words: Steve Jones Boston)
In this lecture, you recall, he offered other scientists to take parts of his samples in order to analyze the "red chips" that he had recently discovered. That was December 2007. These specks have now, in fact, been confirmed to be unexploded ânanostructured super-thermiteâ particles. That confirmation is not just a smoking gun IT IS THE GUN. See the article here:
http://www.prisonplanet.com/scientists-find-active-super-thermite-in-wtc-dust.html
The actual paper in its entirety can be found here in PDF form. Be sure to click the âdownloadâ link here:
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
If you get into the actual paper, you learn that the explosives may actually have been sprayed into position like paint or insulation!
Steve Jonesâ findings may not fit the stories that you have heard in the news but it does lend support to what Johannemann, Jennings and Rodriguez testified that they saw. You say, âThe news media isnât going to shoot itself in the foot by making something up.â So how do we rectify all the contradictions that we were told in the news? Could Steve Jones and these witnesses be glory-seeking kooks trying to make a name for themselves?
Then take a look at this:
Here is a BBC report announcing the collapse of the Solomon Building (the official name for Building Seven). There is only one problem. The reporter standing at the scene and announcing this didn't realize that, in fact, you could still see Building Seven still standing off to the right. It actually collapsed within about 20 minutes after that live report. Watch it here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
(YouTube Key Words: BBC Solomon slips â you get more hits by excluding âslipsâ)
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
(YouTube Key words: PBS Silverstein)
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). Itâs clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. Whatâs in it for these people that were âin the know?â
Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember âThe Roseâ and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name âFederal Reserveâ at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ
(Google Video Key Words: Aaron Russo Warnings)
One more thing. In February 2009 a 44 story Chinese skyscraper caught fire and thoroughly burned into a crinkling cinder. However IT DID NOT COLLAPSE. By comparison WTC Building Seven had a few small fires and was never hit by a plane. It DID COLLAPSE. See that article here:
http://www.infowars.com/fire-consumes-wtc-7-size-skyscraper-building-does-not-collapse
(Google Key Words: China 44 fire consumes)
Amazingly, all this evidence is only the tip of the iceberg. Each of these are separate independent pieces of evidence from unconnected sources. When taken together they paint a clear picture. You are a juror in a court of law. What would be your verdict? Remember, the word âconspiracyâ is not in the dictionary to describe a fiction.
Political Joke: What's the biggest difference between 9/11 and the Oklahoma City Bombing?
Wise Guy
Foreigners once again prove they can do it better and more efficiently.
Answer
Incorrect. The OK bombing wasn't as effective in jump starting the dictatorship we are heading into. I could not find the movie "A Noble Lie" that delves into the OKC Bombing but here's the trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZt4SACTIq8
Now on to 9/11. Let's go through that. Please watch this first video linked here. Itâs only one minute. Youâre going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You didnât see this on TV. Does that prick your interest?
Now look at this. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Building Seven fell later that same day but was NEVER hit by a jet. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. Again, you didn't see Barryâs testimony on TV.
Hereâs some different evidence. Steve Jones, a nuclear physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers and analyzed it. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston
Those âred chipsâ he talked about werenât the smoking gun they were THE GUN. See the article here:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html
Click here for his actual peer-reviewed paper::
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Now get a load of this:
The BBC reported the collapse of the Solomon Building (Building Seven) 20 minutes BEFORE it actually collapsed. Watch that here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). Itâs clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. Whatâs in it for these people that were âin the know?â
Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember âThe Roseâ and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name âFederal Reserveâ at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ
Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
Incorrect. The OK bombing wasn't as effective in jump starting the dictatorship we are heading into. I could not find the movie "A Noble Lie" that delves into the OKC Bombing but here's the trailer:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZt4SACTIq8
Now on to 9/11. Let's go through that. Please watch this first video linked here. Itâs only one minute. Youâre going to be impressed. This is a local news video of a witness named Kenny Johannemann testifying to explosions that happened in the basement of one of the WTC towers. While he is testifying you still see both of the twin towers burning behind him in the background. This was live footage and it's only ONE minute long. Go ahead and watch this here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEuzU3LMgCA
Those explosions were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling the tower. You didnât see this on TV. Does that prick your interest?
Now look at this. Barry Jennings was another witness that got stuck in Building Seven during 9/11. Building Seven fell later that same day but was NEVER hit by a jet. Watch his account here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PbbZE7c3a8Q
Again, the explosions he talked about were from charges that were set up to weaken the structure preparatory to pulling down this building. Again, you didn't see Barryâs testimony on TV.
Hereâs some different evidence. Steve Jones, a nuclear physicist, obtained WTC dust samples from the collapsed WTC towers and analyzed it. He reported his detailed findings here in Boston:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1957490867030316250&ei=JspdSaLNBZa4qAObztThDw&q=steve+jones+boston
Those âred chipsâ he talked about werenât the smoking gun they were THE GUN. See the article here:
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Scientists_find_active_superthermite_in_WTC_0404.html
Click here for his actual peer-reviewed paper::
http://www.bentham.org/open/tocpj/articles/V002/7TOCPJ.htm?TOCPJ/2009/00000002/00000001/7TOCPJ.SGM
Now get a load of this:
The BBC reported the collapse of the Solomon Building (Building Seven) 20 minutes BEFORE it actually collapsed. Watch that here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlL6ewlW6oc
How did the BBC know in advance that Building Seven would collapse? The fact that it was announced in advance is strong support that the flow of information on this tragedy was being controlled.
Were the people at the BBC the only people privy to this information? Probably not. Larry Silverstein was the leaseholder of Building Seven. In a 2002 PBS documentary he talked about how he discussed the Building Seven situation with the fire department and how the decision was made by that department to "pull" it. Well, there is one problem with his testimony that you may want to consider. It takes about a week to rig a building with explosives before you pull it. So are buildings constructed with built-in explosives just in case they need to be blown up in a hurry? Building Seven went down that same day. Whoops! Watch Larry's testimony from the PBS documentary here in this short clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3E-26oVIIs
Incidentally, luckily for Larry, he insured his property in the nick of time just six months before September 11th! It was a sweet deal. So who orchestrated this terrorist event anyway? They had to get past the FBI and CIA and prepare at least three buildings for demolition as well as direct the activities of men with box cutters (if they even existed). Itâs clear from the evidence presented here so far that at least some of the media was in on this. What else could explain the BBC blunder? They had to control the information to those of us who might not like the idea that a few thousand people had to be killed in order to fulfill some kind of agenda. Whatâs in it for these people that were âin the know?â
Aaron Russo was a famous movie producer who became best friends with one of the Rockefeller family members (Remember âThe Roseâ and "Trading Places" starring Eddie Murphy?). This is the same Rockefeller family that is a large shareholder of the Federal Reserve Bank -- a private company that loans money to our government and contributes to our huge national debt. You see the name âFederal Reserveâ at the top the dollar bill. Yes, we're talking about THAT Bank! Anyway, the upshot of this friendship was that in the year 2000 (11 months before 9/11) Aaron Russo learned from his Rockefeller buddy that there was going to be an "event". He was told that out of this event the U.S. would go into Afghanistan and look for Bin Laden in Caves and then the U.S. would go into Iraq. His fascinating testimony about this "event" starts at 26:45 here in this interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGAaPjqdbgQ
Now see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
Powered by Yahoo! Answers
No comments:
Post a Comment